The concept of a behavioral sink has been around for over 40 years. The theory goes that the more crowded a population becomes, the more deviant the behavior becomes. This behavior includes those who are self obsessed, sexually deviant, starve themselves, hide away, decide not to breed etc and this leads to the destruction of the population. Experiments with rats and mice have been repeated many times and although the amount of food and water given have always been plentiful, in each experiment the population still dies out due to the test subjects behavior. The results have been seen as a warning for human society in which, as we become more crowded, we see more deviant behavior, mindless violence, and other behaviors mirroring those of the mice experiments.
But what of the effect of taking a mouse or two from the behavioral sink tank and putting them in a tank where the population is sustainable? What effect would this have. My prediction would be that the one "bad apple" would ruin the whole new population. Why? Just as we can see the same behavior in the mice experiments as for the human population we can also extrapolate backwards from the human "experiments" in the towns and cities of the UK and US. As an experiment, it has been the policy of the US/UK government and it's local councils to force poor and underprivileged people to be placed in "housing association" housing. This is a form of low rent social housing. Many of these are in "estates" but some are single or small groups of houses in leafy suburbs of homes for those who work hard and wish to have as close to an idyllic life as they can. (These are people following the life path expected of them, they work, pay taxes, buy things they don't need to support the economy.........)
The result is that the new person/family who comes in is not compatible with the people in the area and is isolated, they drink, take drugs, batter their children and take drugs, often inviting other assholes to visit creating a sense of fear and hatred from the other residents. This in turn leads to the old residents looking elsewhere for somewhere to live. As the old residents desperately move out they sell to anyone they can including unscrupulous landlords or housing associations and more assholes move in. Within a few years the leafy suburb where once children were able to play freely turns into a dirty, violent, drug riddled and drunken area where it is not safe for people to leave there homes. Nothing is maintained by the lazy self obsessed and so the area becomes derelict. So my prediction for the mice? If the old mice are allowed to leave the main area then they will form new communities in other areas and the new mice will take over where the old mice were. If the old mice cannot leave then they will, within a few generations, be pulled down into the same behavior of the new mice.
We are a research orientated organisation but we do not have the facility for such an experiment, it would be interesting if someone could carry out this experiment for us. This would have to be repeated several times to get a good set of data. Please let us know if you are interested by e mailing firstname.lastname@example.org.
The explanation for the behavior above goes beyond the simple social implications of mixing different subcultures. The issues of people not wanting to associate with those out of their own socio-economic group does not explain why one family can ruin a whole area simply by being there. The truth lies in the "energy well" that the chaotic and deprived create and exist within. This energy well distorts the energy around them in the same way that a planet creates a gravity well which then pulls on the other entities around them. If you remove the "problem family" then the energy and the area return to a state of balance and calm. The problem is that these families create such a tension in the energy/mindscape/matrix that it affects all of the people around them. The Matrix is skewed so that focus is on them and thus the mindscapes created by others within that area of the matrix include the programming of the problem family. In other words, the problem is constantly in the other residents minds and so it forms part of their reality. The energy well pulls others in as they are normalized to the depraved behaviors and accept them, often then falling into the same patterns as their vibration slowly changes.
Could the Illuminati be deliberately manipulating policy so that these bad apples invade all nice spaces and turn them into poor areas? This would then lead to a dumbed down society but would only lead to population reduction once the population reached the threshold of the behavioral sink. (The dumbed down society and population reduction are two of the goals of the illuminati). I think that this could be the case as in every area new problem families are constantly being moved in by social policies which are dictated by "government". I have recently been lucky enough to loose a problem neighbor (after much light meditation), and the energy in the area I live in has changed significantly. The energy level of the lower energies has decreased significantly and the higher energies form a much higher proportion making it much easier to meditate to higher levels of consciousness. The behavioral sink it seems is also a moral and spiritual one.
Sacred Meditation has three resident writers who have collectively studied meditation for 72 years and currently write articles on natural health, health freedom and research aspects of food, healing and mindfulness.